Week 47, 2012: Turkey adventure -- summary
(Show distances in kilometers / miles)
Ok, time to sum it up. This was a week completely dominated by my trip to Yosemite, where I did just over 100 miles of running over the park in four days. You can read about it in the posts about Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 and Day 4
As you may recall from my fist post this whole thing, apart from being a lot of fun, was kind of a test before my 100-mile ultra next year. And by the way, I'm becoming more and more convinced that I'll go for Rio Del Lago in the end. Anyhow. It's a bit early to think about goals but a rather obvious one would be to break the 24h mark. I read somewhere recently that setting goals based on "round numbers" is silly and is asking for trouble and instead one should base them on one's abilities, previous races etc. I agree with that wholeheartedly. However, how can one resist the 24h goal? Not only is it a super cool goal in itself, allowing one to boast having ran 100 miles in one day ;), but on top of that many races (including Rio Del Lago) recognize this achievement with a special buckle. To put it in perspective: 10 out of 44 finishers of Del Lago last year made it within 24h, plus 1 out of 11 ladies. Not going to be easy...
So, let's do what I love so munch and crunch some numbers from the runs that I did over those 4 days.
Day | Time | Distance | Elevation gain |
---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | 3:26 +1:38 = 5:04 | 24.8km + 16.0km = 40.8km15.4EM + 9.9EM = 25.4EM | 927m + 0m = 927m3,041 ft |
Day 2 | 7:02 | 42.6km26.5EM | 2,495m8186 ft |
Day 3 | 7:23 | 41.8km26.0EM | 3,061m10,043 ft |
Day 4 | 3:06 + 3:37 = 6:43 | 20.5km + 21.8km = 42.3km12.7EM + 13.5EM = 26.3EM | 820m + 1,053m = 1,873m2,690 ft + 3,455 ft = 6,145 ft |
SUMMARY | 26:12 | 167.5km104.1EM | 8,356m27,415 ft |
Ok, so scaling the total distance to 100 miles that would translate to a target time of 25:10. Not quite 24:00, but not too far either. Of course this can hardly be taken as an esimate of any sorts. On one hand during those 4 days I was just having fun, taking it easy, stopping often to take photos etc. instead of racing with adrenaline pumping in my veins. Moreover, next to covering the distance of 167.5km104.1EM I also scored 8,356m27,415 ft of vertical gain (that almost covers Mount Everest); from the elevation chart of Rio Del Lago it looks like I'll have to do half of that at most. On the other hand, and that's a much more important difference, in between those runs I had 3 nights of sleep (and many hours of rest during the day) to recover and 6 meals (3 breakfasts and 3 dinners) to replenish my fuel supplies; I won't have those luxuries on the race day and that will obviously make a tremendous difference.
It was also interesting to see what effect all this running had on my body. I recently got myself a Withings body scale. I got it mostly for the convenience of having the measurements online without having to do anything (it connects wirelessly) and, frankly, I didn't have high hopes of the accuracy of its body fat readings. But then I noticed that the readings actually make perfect and that after all my weekend long runs my body fat would drop noticeably (and my weight not necessarily; I'm trying to stay well hydrated). I started having more trust in this feature of the scale and below you can see a screenshot showing the effect of the Yosemite trip on my body fat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/242f7/242f7d4a2328566c165e033f11207f860cfc8e8b" alt=""
Yes, it jumped back to the previous level rather quickly but that may have something to do with the fact that I did nothing in the following week and was happily eating lots of ice-cream at work ;)
Another thing that I checked was what my Polar watch has to say. It has this Fitness test feature, which is supposed to measure one's fitness level and approximate one's VO2 max, a widely recognized fitness indicator in endurance sports. Here, again I noticed a huge difference after this weekend, including a bump on the scale from Very good to Elite. See chart below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/254b5/254b58364eb9e1925c9a42ab6623972cf2aa051a" alt=""
Unless Polar is cheating (after all the watch knows about all the exercising that I'm doing and I only hope that it does not factor it in when performing the test and bases it on HR readings alone), this would indicate a huge impact of those series of trainings. Could it really be that dramatic? Right away? If so, maybe I should do it more often ;)...
Even if not, I think I should do it more often anyway. Because the most important conclusion of all is this: it was fun. I enjoyed it immensely. And I am looking forward to an opportunity of doing something similar in the near future (Death Valley? :).
Comments